The Governance of Open Source Software Communities
An Exploratory Analysis
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate the nature of the relationships between dimensions of governance in Open Source (OS) communities. A recent review highlighted this issue as critical. Furthermore, this issue has been recognized as strategic for managing the trade-off between innovation and standardization, the capacity of firms to profit from their investment in open source, and the sustainability of OS projects. Our results are based on a comparative analysis of 40 OS projects contained in the Freshmeat dataset. For each project, we collected data on the governance solutions implemented. Governance mechanisms have been ranked for their degree of openness. Our findings show that OS governance is configurational. Those configurations are defined along two dimensions: leadership and decision-making distribution, and reciprocity of the appropriability regime. Four configurations are indeed defined: open source, sponsored, reciprocity-based, and tolerant dictatorship. Those configurations have been defined based on an exploratory factor analysis.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
